Posted: April 4th, 2019

Statistical Process Control Methods

OPSCB/574 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric – grade miners score
Course Title: Creating Value Through Operations
Competency Assessment Title: Statistical Process Control Methods
Total Number of Points: 100
Assignment Directions
Step 1: Process Evaluation
Create a new Word doc for the elements of this assignment.
Evaluate your process using 1 of the following:
• Use the lean concept to find ways to eliminate waste and improve the process.
• Use SPC or Six Sigma to reduce defects or variances in the process.
Add your evaluation to your Word doc with the header “Process Evaluation.”
Step 2: Evaluation of Control Chart and Process Metrics
Complete the following in Excel:
• Calculate the defined process metrics including variation and process capability.
• Develop and display a control chart for the process.
• Evaluate the control chart and process metrics using Statistical Process Control (SPC) methods. Determine whether the process could benefit from the
use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. (Include all calculation and charts.)
Write your evaluation in your assignment Word doc under the header “Evaluation of Control Chart and Process Metrics.”
OPSCB/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score Page 2 of 3
Step 3: Executive Summary
Write a 700-word executive summary that includes the following:
• A summary of the Process Evaluation (using either Lean or SPC or Six Sigma)
• A summary of the Evaluation of Control Chart and Process metrics based on SPC methods
• A summary of your evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools
• A – description of the SPC project and recommendations for improvements
Add your summary to your Word doc with the header, “Executive Summary.”
OPSCB/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score Page 3 of 3
Competency Assessment Rubric – grade miners score
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
1. Evaluation of the process
(weight 20%)
Thoroughly evaluated the process. Partially evaluated the process. Narrowly evaluated the process or
did not submit evaluation of
process.
2. Evaluation of the control chart and
process metrics using the statistical
process control methods
(weight 20%)
Thoroughly evaluated the control
chart and process metrics using
statistical process control methods.
Partially evaluated the control chart
and process metrics using statistical
process control methods.
Narrowly evaluated the control chart
and process metrics using statistical
process control methods or did not
submit evaluation of the control chart
and process metrics using statistical
process control methods.
3. Process evaluation summary
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly developed a summary of
the process evaluation.
Partially developed a summary of
the process evaluation.
Narrowly developed a summary of the
process evaluation or did not submit a
summary of the process evaluation.
4. Summary of control chart and
process metrics based on SPC
methods
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly developed a summary of
the evaluation of control chart and
process metrics based on SPC
methods.
Partially developed a summary of
the evaluation of control chart and
process metrics based on SPC
methods.
Narrowly developed a summary of the
evaluation of control chart and
process metrics based on SPC
methods or did not submit a summary
of the process evaluation.
5. Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools
evaluation summary
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly developed a summary of
the evaluation of whether the
process would benefit from the use
of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
Partially developed a summary of
the evaluation of whether the
process would benefit from the use
of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
Narrowly developed a summary of the
evaluation of whether the process
would benefit from the use of Six
Sigma, Lean, or other tools or did not
submit a summary of the evaluation of
whether the process would benefit
from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or
other tools
6. Description of the Statistical
Process Control (SPC) project
(weight 15%)
Provided a detailed – description of the
SPC project.
Provided a partial – description of the
SPC project. Provided a narrow – description of the
SPC project or did not provide a
– description of the SPC project.
7. Recommendations for
improvement
(weight 15%)
Provided detailed recommendations
for improvements.
Provided partial recommendations
for improvements. Provided vague recommendations
for improvements or did not provide
recommendations for improvements.

____________________
Here is a rubric for assessing the competency in creating value through operations, specifically focusing on statistical process control methods:

Can I See Writer Credentials?

You can view anonymized writer profiles, highlighting their degrees and expertise, to feel confident in who’s handling your paper. Each profile gives you a clear picture of their background, so you know they’re qualified for the job. Our team ensures every writer meets high academic standards. This transparency helps students make informed choices and find the best academic writing help online.

OPSCB/574 Competency 1 Rubric – grade miners score

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery (100%) Meets Expectations (85%) Not Met (0%)
Evaluation of the process (weight 20%) | Thoroughly evaluated the process. | Partially evaluated the process. | Narrowly evaluated the process or did not submit evaluation of the process.
Evaluation of the control chart and process metrics using the statistical process control methods (weight 20%) | Thoroughly evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods. | Partially evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods. | Narrowly evaluated the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods or did not submit evaluation of the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods.
Process evaluation summary (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the process evaluation. | Partially developed a summary of the process evaluation. | Narrowly developed a summary of the process evaluation or did not submit a summary of the process evaluation.
Summary of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods. | Partially developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods. | Narrowly developed a summary of the evaluation of control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods or did not submit a summary of the process evaluation.
Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools evaluation summary (weight 10%) | Thoroughly developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. | Partially developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools. | Narrowly developed a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools or did not submit a summary of the evaluation of whether the process would benefit from the use of Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools.
Description of the Statistical Process Control (SPC) project (weight 15%) | Provided a detailed – description of the SPC project. | Provided a partial – description of the SPC project. | Provided a narrow – description of the SPC project or did not provide a – description of the SPC project.
Recommendations for improvement (weight 15%) | Provided detailed recommendations for improvements. | Provided partial recommendations for improvements. | Provided vague recommendations for improvements or did not provide recommendations for improvements.
The rubric evaluates the following aspects of the assignment:

Evaluation of the process.
Evaluation of the control chart and process metrics using statistical process control methods.
Process evaluation summary.
Summary of the control chart and process metrics based on SPC methods.
Six Sigma, Lean, or other tools evaluation summary.
Description of the Statistical Process Control (SPC) project.
Recommendations for improvement.
Each criterion is assigned a weight, indicating its importance in the overall assessment. The “Mastery” column represents the criteria that demonstrate a thorough understanding and application of the concepts, while the “Meets Expectations” column indicates a satisfactory level of achievement. The “Not Met” column signifies that the criteria were not adequately addressed or not submitted.

Grades can be assigned based on the performance level achieved in each criterion, and the total score can be calculated to determine the overall competency assessment.

What If I Need Last-Minute Changes?

No problem! Request revisions anytime within 7 days, and we’ll tweak your paper quickly to meet your needs, free of charge. Our flexible process keeps your paper on track. Just update your order details in your account. Fast and responsive revision services are key for students managing tight deadlines.

Order|Paper Discounts